Last week I introduced IPv6, which is the eventual solution to the IPv4 address exhaustion issue. Besides having a much, much larger addressing space (from 4 followed by 9 zeros to 3 followed by 38 zeros), IPv6 has a number of other features built in, including some security features. It’s more complicated than IPv4, which means us propellorheads will have to get bigger propellors. Probably the biggest issue with IPv6 is that it isn’t compatible with IPv4. If the equipment is designed for it, such as routers, computers and such, the equipment can handle it, but it’s like having two different networks on the same wire — they don’t talk to each other.
There is some equipment that can translate between the two protocols, but I suspect what will happen is that internet providers will at some point simply stop issuing IPv4 addresses and require using IPv6 addresses. I don’t think that will happen for several years, but when it does it may mean buying a new router and/or getting some help with reconfiguring the network on our computers.
For instance, I run both a Cisco “Pix” firewall and a wireless router on my home network. The Pix supports IPv6 at software version 7.0. I can upgrade the software in the Pix, but I don’t think the model I have can be upgraded past the version I have already, so it’s likely my Pix will become obsolete. That was an expensive piece of gear — about $500 new. The modern replacement for the Pix will cost about $350 new, although I might could find a used higher-model Pix that could handle IPv6. And then again there are probably other firewall-routers out there that would do the same thing(s) for much less. The wireless router would also have to be replaced — it doesn’t handle IPv6 no way, no how. Fortunately there again there are better wireless routers on the market that sell for $100 or so. One of the things I really need the Pix for is getting a VPN (“Virtual Private Network”) connection into my home network from “outside.” The newer wireless router I mentioned does VPN, so it might satisfy the need within a single network appliance.
It seems likely that most of us will have upgraded to IPv6 compatible equipment by the time it becomes a requirement. Granted that I tend to run things for years past their normal lifetimes, but I have had to replace our wireless router about 5 years ago when the old one succumbed to a lightning storm, or getting too hot or something. So, it seems reasonable that it will have to be replaced again eventually, and all the new ones support IPv6, and usually also are faster and more powerful.
IPv6 is supported on Windows XP and later, and although it needs to be turned on and may take some tweaking, after being turned on it should configure itself just as your PC does now when you connect it to your wireless or wired router.
Got a computer question or having an issue that would make a good article? Contact the author through the Journal or WizGidget.com